<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.12.2#9120002-sha1:301bf498dd45d800842af0b84230f1bb58606c13) at Sun Jan 12 12:13:00 UTC 2025

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Mojang Studios Jira</title>
    <link>https://bugs.mojang.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.12.2</version>
        <build-number>9120002</build-number>
        <build-date>10-01-2024</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[MC-6980] Activator rails is cheaper than ordinary rails</title>
                <link>https://bugs.mojang.com/browse/MC-6980</link>
                <project id="10400" key="MC">Minecraft: Java Edition</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;An odd, and perhaps undesirable, situation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What I expected was a recipe similar to powered rails with iron instead of gold, but instead the recipe is like rails minus the stick.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This creates the situation that many people, for example out of laziness of chopping wood, will use activator rails instead of ordinary rails as long as they do not plan for their track to use TNT carts specifically.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="19757">MC-6980</key>
            <summary>Activator rails is cheaper than ordinary rails</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://bugs.mojang.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=18903&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                    <status id="5" iconUrl="https://bugs.mojang.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="7">Invalid</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="-1">Unassigned</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="shadowtani">Tanisha Angelia</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 01:42:37 +0100</created>
                <updated>Thu, 4 May 2017 09:45:49 +0200</updated>
                            <resolved>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 07:27:36 +0100</resolved>
                                    <version>Snapshot 13w02a</version>
                                                                        <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>1</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="35376" author="cubethethird" created="Fri, 11 Jan 2013 07:27:36 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;This is not a bug, but a feature request, and should be posted on the MC forums &lt;a href=&quot;http://goo.gl/7qGlN&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="35304" author="shadowtani" created="Fri, 11 Jan 2013 02:57:11 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;That might be possible, and I hope so. Recipe inconsistencies probably just bother me to an OCD-like level due to me not using the wiki the first months I played Minecraft. xD Yes, even if the recipe is so simple you can&apos;t possibly miss it when you make rails, oh well. :/&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="35300" author="felk" created="Fri, 11 Jan 2013 02:40:33 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;I think its just a placeholder recipe by now&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="35291" author="shadowtani" created="Fri, 11 Jan 2013 02:15:39 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;OK, that&apos;s true, I didn&apos;t think about the quantity difference. Still that only solves the potential undesirable situation. I still find the recipe odd however, as it differs from the other redstone based rail recipes (an inconsistency). :/ The mods can slap a &quot;works as intended&quot; on this if they want, but I&apos;ll probably continue to nag about it on the forums. ;P&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="35288" author="felk" created="Fri, 11 Jan 2013 02:09:23 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;You only get 6 rails.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                    <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10500" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:radiobuttons">
                        <customfieldname>Confirmation Status</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10300"><![CDATA[Unconfirmed]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_11700" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_11600" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>0|i00ztb:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>