<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.12.2#9120002-sha1:301bf498dd45d800842af0b84230f1bb58606c13) at Sun Jan 12 12:12:24 UTC 2025

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Mojang Studios Jira</title>
    <link>https://bugs.mojang.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.12.2</version>
        <build-number>9120002</build-number>
        <build-date>10-01-2024</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[MC-6797] You can&apos;t craft a quartz block into nether quartz</title>
                <link>https://bugs.mojang.com/browse/MC-6797</link>
                <project id="10400" key="MC">Minecraft: Java Edition</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;The title is self-explainatory.&lt;br/&gt;
What I expected : I can get back my nether quartz&lt;br/&gt;
What happend : You can&apos;t craft back&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="19568">MC-6797</key>
            <summary>You can&apos;t craft a quartz block into nether quartz</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://bugs.mojang.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=18903&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                    <status id="5" iconUrl="https://bugs.mojang.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="6">Works As Intended</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="-1">Unassigned</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="theo77186">theo</reporter>
                        <labels>
                            <label>quartz</label>
                    </labels>
                <created>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:51:03 +0100</created>
                <updated>Tue, 2 Apr 2024 12:44:49 +0200</updated>
                            <resolved>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:30:11 +0100</resolved>
                                    <version>Snapshot 13w02a</version>
                    <version>Snapshot 13w02b</version>
                    <version>Snapshot 13w03a</version>
                    <version>Snapshot 13w04a</version>
                                                                        <votes>18</votes>
                                    <watches>5</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="1122766" author="JIRAUSER649715" created="Tue, 7 Dec 2021 17:13:52 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;same with cut copper, just quartz doesn&apos;t have a storage variant&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="238885" author="mustek" created="Sat, 1 Aug 2015 13:41:26 +0200"  >&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s not a bug, in the same way you can&apos;t &quot;uncraft&quot; stone bricks.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="238884" author="bubby3" created="Sat, 1 Aug 2015 13:39:49 +0200"  >&lt;p&gt;Still an issue in 1.8.8 and 15w31c&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="65510" author="gerbilcrab475" created="Wed, 8 May 2013 22:49:41 +0200"  >&lt;p&gt;Yeah, it&apos;s pretty dumb how they just put &quot;works as intended&quot; even though Mojang doesn&apos;t even give any input.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="41792" author="torabi" created="Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:57:49 +0100"  >&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;How is &quot;works as intended&quot; decided on this website - has Mojang given any input?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A random person says &quot;Works as intended.&quot; A random mod then changed the resolution field to &quot;Works As Intended&quot;. Occasionally, if you&apos;re lucky, a developer will actually be involved, or a source can be found of them saying that some thing or another is intended.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It really doesn&apos;t matter whether an issue is classified as a bug or a feature request. What matters is that you make a compelling argument for the change, and the developers have a chance to see and consider it. So go with the flow. If an issue you care about is rejected here, don&apos;t fight it &amp;#8211; post on the suggestions &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.minecraftforum.net/forum/1-suggestions/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;forum&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reddit.com/r/minecraftsuggestions/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;subreddit&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="41646" author="wolfiemario" created="Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:00:43 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;There are six people who say it should be revertible, and five (four without Arthur) who say this works as intended. How is &quot;works as intended&quot; decided on this website - has Mojang given any input?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="41615" author="fuj1n" created="Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:30:11 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;Works as intended.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="41614" author="shadowiki" created="Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:28:29 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;Works as intended. It&apos;s a block. Building block.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="40403" author="theo77186" created="Sun, 27 Jan 2013 18:46:51 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;11 votes. It&apos;s not enough to get it resolved. Still not resolved. I&apos;m certain it&apos;s a storage block.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="38156" author="wolfiemario" created="Sat, 19 Jan 2013 02:45:22 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;Bricks craft Brick blocks and flower pots, both of which are decorative (and the latter is a recent item). Quartz crafts daylight detectors, comparators, and Blocks of Quartz. It has three distinct purposes so far, and we can expect more as more redstone components roll out.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While it may be nice to be able to retrieve bricks from brick blocks for flower pots, redstone components have many more uses, and quartz can be a pain to get on a server once people have gone on a mining spree in the nether (the same reason glowstone&apos;s worth inflates so badly). Clay can be found in any river, ocean, lake, or swamp, and isn&apos;t nearly as sought-after.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="38154" author="banana478" created="Sat, 19 Jan 2013 02:31:05 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;Then why Quartz into Quartz?!&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="37917" author="theo77186" created="Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:46:56 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;I don&apos;t see interest of turning bricks into brick (item).&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="37528" author="banana478" created="Thu, 17 Jan 2013 20:16:40 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;I mean turning the brick block into four bricks. I don&apos;t see why behavior for Nether Quartz Blocks should be different.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="37448" author="theo77186" created="Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:06:10 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;For the brick, you need to cook clay ball to get brick. This is irreversible. Clay is common near water. Bricks has &lt;b&gt;only&lt;/b&gt; decoration purpose. But nether quartz is useful in redstone circuit. For the sapling, you put sapling on the ground then you will get wood.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="37137" author="wolfiemario" created="Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:17:25 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;You can&apos;t uncraft snow or clay blocks, but you can still retrieve 100% of the resources by breaking it on the ground. For glowstone, of course, you&apos;ll need Fortune III, but it can still be done.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The use for uncrafting bricks is limited - until recently, bricks had no purpose besides brick blocks. The use of decrafting sandstone is limited considering how abundant sand is. The same can be said of nether bricks, which have no worth outside being crafted to a block, and come from an abundant material.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Jeb purported that quartz blocks will be a mineral storage block. They do act as storage for the mineral, in as much as glowstone blocks act as storage for glowstone dust (and I&apos;ve seen people use it for this purpose). However, the stored mineral cannot be retrieved.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Quartz is not as common as netherrack or sand - it is a mineral which comes from an ore scattered in veins in the nether, not a primary biome constituent. You can&apos;t just harvest a load of it by continuously digging nonstop. The block itself is named &quot;Block of Quartz&quot;, following the naming convention unique to Block of Iron, Gold, Diamond, Emerald, Lapis, and Redstone. The material comes from an explicitly-declared Ore block placed in the world by the standard Ore generator.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Redstone blocks are different among storage blocks in that they have a function in redstone. Why can&apos;t Block of Quartz still be a storage block, just because its crafting recipe is 2x2 instead of 3x3? A single stack of blocks may not accommodate an entire row of quartz from an inventory, but the fact remains that you save on a significant amount of space with it. There aren&apos;t any game balance issues by allowing us to revert a Block of Quartz to its mineral. People could just as easily grief your quartz citadel because they wanted to build with quartz, you know.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="37134" author="banana478" created="Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:30:47 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;But then you can&apos;t craft back stone bricks! And how to you craft saplings into wood? Another example: you can&apos;t decraft a brick block. This behavior for quartz makes perfect stuff.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="37133" author="theo77186" created="Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:06:23 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;Despite being different of other mineral blocks, many people thinks it&apos;s a storage block.&lt;br/&gt;
You can get wood from saplings and stone bricks by crafting with stone which is a &lt;b&gt;very common renewable&lt;/b&gt; resource.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="36607" author="banana478" created="Sun, 13 Jan 2013 23:54:53 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;Quartz block differs from storage blocks because its crafting recipe requires only 4 quartz, not 9. You can&apos;t get wood from putting a crafting table in a crafting place.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="34986" author="wolfiemario" created="Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:26:03 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;Agreed, I&apos;m sure many people expected Block of Quartz to act as a storage block, regardless of its aesthetic appeal. The aesthetics argument can be used on any other mineral block; I&apos;ve seen people build with those as well. Also, this would give a way of reverting chiseled and pillar quartz to their original block form, aside from using double slabs (which actually do not look the same as Block of Quartz anyhow)&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="34859" author="megascience" created="Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:39:50 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;I assume making this possible would be complicated due to the variations included. However, I also expected that you could break them back down into quartz. I suppose, considering the usefulness of Nether Quartz, trying to make a large structure out of it would be a prime target for people to deconstruct to make their own devices. In that case, this would make sense. However, I would still rather be able to reverse the process should I wish.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="34828" author="jadenwong" created="Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:23:47 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;I was surprised too. And also you can&apos;t craft a pillar or chiseled back into normal quartz block (like the crafting of smooth sandstone)&lt;br/&gt;
(You can craft slaps and stairs from pillar and chiseled)&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="34809" author="firehunterx" created="Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:11:07 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;Most Ore Blocks, Including Redstone, can be crafted back into 9 of the ore it&apos;s made of.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You should be able to craft quartz back into quartz, as it is an ore block.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="34801" author="ev149" created="Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:04:09 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m fairly certain this is intended behavior.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="34793" author="meta" created="Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:58:05 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;@Moritz: that&apos;s a good point but even redstone blocks and emerald blocks are decraftable.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="34786" author="xmoe" created="Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:53:27 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;Confirmed, even though I am not sure if this is a bug... you also cant craft stonebricks back into normal stones.&lt;br/&gt;
As far as I understood, it is just a decorative block and should not save inventory space.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10102">
                    <name>Duplicate</name>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is duplicated by">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="19874">MC-7096</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="20227">MC-7436</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="26884">MC-12146</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="27569">MC-12707</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="46296">MC-26676</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="71937">MC-46333</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="82296">MC-55816</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="103678">MC-75497</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="424437">MC-220377</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="554419">MC-270286</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10500" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:radiobuttons">
                        <customfieldname>Confirmation Status</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10300"><![CDATA[Unconfirmed]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_11700" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                <customfield id="customfield_11100" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:float">
                        <customfieldname>Linked</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>4.0</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <customfield id="customfield_11600" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>0|i0h95b:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>