<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.12.2#9120002-sha1:301bf498dd45d800842af0b84230f1bb58606c13) at Sun Jan 12 12:02:52 UTC 2025

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Mojang Studios Jira</title>
    <link>https://bugs.mojang.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.12.2</version>
        <build-number>9120002</build-number>
        <build-date>10-01-2024</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[MC-3930] colormaps/foliage.png not affecting birch and spruce leaves, watercolor.png not changing water at all</title>
                <link>https://bugs.mojang.com/browse/MC-3930</link>
                <project id="10400" key="MC">Minecraft: Java Edition</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;the foliagecolor.png part of texture packs only affects regular oak and jungle trees. it has no effect on either spruce or birch ones, they&apos;re always default green even if you recolor your texture pack&apos;s foliage to red or blue.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;same goes for watercolor, except it doesn&apos;t do anything at all. no matter what you recolor it to, water will remain blue.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Resource pack of &lt;a href=&quot;https://bugs.mojang.com/browse/MC-30445&quot; title=&quot;Swamp &amp;amp; Mesa Biome Grass Ignores both Colormaps&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;MC-30445&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;MC-30445&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; can be used to reproduce.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment>windows xp 32 bit, java 1.7, geforce 450 gtx</environment>
        <key id="16191">MC-3930</key>
            <summary>colormaps/foliage.png not affecting birch and spruce leaves, watercolor.png not changing water at all</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://bugs.mojang.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=18903&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                    <status id="5" iconUrl="https://bugs.mojang.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="6">Works As Intended</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="-1">Unassigned</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="yarrmateys">yarrmateys</reporter>
                        <labels>
                            <label>resource-pack</label>
                    </labels>
                <created>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:15:35 +0100</created>
                <updated>Sat, 4 Jun 2022 23:21:06 +0200</updated>
                            <resolved>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:24:16 +0200</resolved>
                                    <version>Minecraft 1.4.5</version>
                    <version>Minecraft 1.7.4</version>
                    <version>Minecraft 1.7.9</version>
                    <version>Minecraft 14w18b</version>
                    <version>Minecraft 14w19a</version>
                    <version>Minecraft 14w20b</version>
                    <version>Minecraft 1.8</version>
                    <version>Minecraft 1.8.1-pre3</version>
                    <version>Minecraft 1.8.3</version>
                    <version>Minecraft 15w51b</version>
                    <version>Minecraft 1.10.2</version>
                    <version>Minecraft 16w38a</version>
                    <version>1.14.4</version>
                                                                        <votes>40</votes>
                                    <watches>26</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="584412" author="slicedlime" created="Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:57:22 +0200"  >&lt;p&gt;The inconsistency is intended, which is why this is closed. For Vanilla Minecraft, it is definitely intended that certain types of leaf blocks (like spruce) are intended to always look the same and not be colored by biome variations (much like real life spruce).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We do want to provide more configurability for things like that, and data driving how biome coloring affects block types would be a great thing to have for resource packs - but that is not strictly what this bug is about, and adding it would be adding a feature for extensibility, not fixing this bug in specific.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And again, this not being considered a bug doesn&apos;t mean it won&apos;t happen, it just means that we do not consider this &quot;faulty&quot; as described in this bug report. As violine noted, please move any further discussion about this to the subreddit.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="584329" author="violine1101" created="Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:08:43 +0200"  >&lt;p&gt;Please do not use the bug tracker as a discussion forum. Please use &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reddit.com/r/Mojira/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;/r/Mojira&lt;/a&gt; instead.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="584312" author="lapisdemon" created="Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:51:34 +0200"  >&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://bugs.mojang.com/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=nighter&quot; class=&quot;user-hover&quot; rel=&quot;nighter&quot;&gt;nighter&lt;/a&gt; I absolutely agree with &lt;a href=&quot;https://bugs.mojang.com/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=FaRo1&quot; class=&quot;user-hover&quot; rel=&quot;FaRo1&quot;&gt;FaRo1&lt;/a&gt; and also want to state that this is an inconsistency.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If this bugpost would have been resolved as WAI without giving any reason, I would have assumed something which is intel I&apos;ve gotten several years ago though.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Back then I asked a dev regarding textures such as foliage, (custom) sky, environment etc., and he wrote something along the lines of, that some things related to texturepacks would require a massive rewrite. That he actually already tried to implement something which is currently hardcoded, but it didn&apos;t work out with that code base (don&apos;t nail me down 100% to those words, it&apos;s saved similar like this in my memory, I mainly recall that he wanted to give texturepack makers more possibilities, but it was not possible at that time).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;From what I know so far about this bugtracker, is, that in some cases &quot;works as intended&quot; can also mean something like &quot;we can&apos;t currently do this, it may be fixed one day, it also might not be on the top of our priority list, and it may very well be that, if it will be possible one day, it may not be in the format this bugpost refers to, so we might as well close it, and as we must not reveal specific future plans for Minecraft to the public, we sadly can&apos;t tell you that this will be possible one day.&quot;, but this is apparently not the case here by closing the bugpost as a &quot;feature request&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To emphasize again: Closing this bugpost as a feature request seems wrong, as it&apos;s also for me an inconsistency.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am aware that since the acquisition by Microsoft, plans may have changed tremendously, which is not the Devs&apos; fault, but, regardless, I want to link again a Redditpost by Mr. Broes:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reddit.com/r/Minecraft/comments/66gcg9/comment/dgiy1xb&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://www.reddit.com/r/Minecraft/comments/66gcg9/comment/dgiy1xb&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It would be very kind of you, Mr. &#214;sterg&#229;rd, to ask the developer who would be currently responsible for theoretically implementing it into Vanilla, so you could re-evaluate to possibly leave this bugpost open, or, if you are allowed to, to give us any intel about future plans regarding this.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thank you!&lt;/p&gt;

</comment>
                            <comment id="584308" author="farogaming" created="Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:57:03 +0200"  >&lt;p&gt;How so? The water colouring is already implemented, it just doesn&apos;t work. And that certain leaves are not affected is at least an inconsistency.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="584299" author="nighter" created="Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:24:16 +0200"  >&lt;p&gt;This is a feature request.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="511022" author="lapisdemon" created="Tue, 8 Jan 2019 20:36:18 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://bugs.mojang.com/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=Captain_Spicyboy&quot; class=&quot;user-hover&quot; rel=&quot;Captain_Spicyboy&quot;&gt;Captain_Spicyboy&lt;/a&gt; In my opinion, &quot;Postponed&quot; leaves open a hope, than not intending to do anything about it at all.&lt;br/&gt;
Didn&apos;t you read what was written here in the comments? Mr. Broes mentioned on Reddit that he got a prototype for it, however - from own experience and those of what I&apos;ve read from Mojira mods - it isn&apos;t always easy to implement certain things into Minecraft, due to various reasons, let alone having to make priority decisions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For the time being, I inserted a json with which you can work with, if you want to colour birch leaves.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I can very well understand frustration, but I have yet to see that venting against someone who isn&apos;t on your payroll or you have got some other form of power over, but you want something from them, will turn out in 100% of the cases to the favour of the angry person. So if you want to do yourself and the rest of us, who&apos;d love this to be done someday, a favour, try to keep your criticism as humane as you can, and, if that critique contains nothing that really contributes to a bugpost, then do this preferrably outside of this bugtracker, e.g. on the Mojira Subreddit, thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="511008" author="captain_spicyboy" created="Tue, 8 Jan 2019 20:09:47 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m kind of getting sick of this being an issue and the fact that the other articles are &quot;resolved&quot; all leading to this one that is still open and is &quot;postponed&quot; it feels more like the devs should just tell us they don&apos;t intend to do shit about it, throw an &quot;abandoned&quot; into the labels, and add it to this issue.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="500658" author="lapisdemon" created="Tue, 13 Nov 2018 09:38:19 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;If needed, the workaround as described by &lt;a href=&quot;https://bugs.mojang.com/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=JellyFishGreen&quot; class=&quot;user-hover&quot; rel=&quot;JellyfishGreen&quot;&gt;JellyFishGreen&lt;/a&gt; works, however the correct birch_leaves.json is:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;{
    &quot;parent&quot;: &quot;block/cube_all&quot;,
    &quot;textures&quot;: {
       &quot;all&quot;: &quot;block/birch_leaves&quot;
     }
}
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt; &lt;span class=&quot;image-wrap&quot; style=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;a id=&quot;189488_thumb&quot; href=&quot;https://bugs.mojang.com/secure/attachment/189488/189488_2018-11-13_09.26.51.png&quot; title=&quot;2018-11-13_09.26.51.png&quot; file-preview-type=&quot;image&quot; file-preview-id=&quot;189488&quot; file-preview-title=&quot;2018-11-13_09.26.51.png&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://bugs.mojang.com/secure/thumbnail/189488/_thumb_189488.png&quot; style=&quot;border: 0px solid black&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; which results in a completely colourless, gray leaves texture that doesn&apos;t use the foliage.png as tint source.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; &lt;span class=&quot;image-wrap&quot; style=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;a id=&quot;189489_thumb&quot; href=&quot;https://bugs.mojang.com/secure/attachment/189489/189489_2018-11-13_09.29.12.png&quot; title=&quot;2018-11-13_09.29.12.png&quot; file-preview-type=&quot;image&quot; file-preview-id=&quot;189489&quot; file-preview-title=&quot;2018-11-13_09.29.12.png&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://bugs.mojang.com/secure/thumbnail/189489/_thumb_189489.png&quot; style=&quot;border: 0px solid black&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; In order to have the birch leaves coloured, you have to colour the birch_leaves.png file.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="500236" author="jellyfishgreen" created="Sat, 10 Nov 2018 16:36:58 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;Tip from HeroQBE in minecraftforum.net, possible workaround:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;For editing e.g. birch leaf color create or edit the file birch_leaves.json in the folder YourResourcepack\assets\minecraft\models\block\ and edit it like that:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;{{{}}&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;tt&gt;&#160; &#160; &quot;parent&quot;: &quot;block/cube_all&quot;,&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;tt&gt;&#160; &#160; &quot;textures&quot;: {&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;tt&gt;&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;&quot;all&quot;: &quot;blocks/leaves_birch&quot;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;tt&gt;&#160; &#160; &#160;&lt;/tt&gt;}&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;tt&gt;}&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That will just turn off the block tint and you can change the leaves_birch.png in the YourResourcepack\assets\minecraft\textures\blocks\ folder like you want &lt;img class=&quot;emoticon&quot; src=&quot;https://bugs.mojang.com/images/icons/emoticons/smile.png&quot; height=&quot;16&quot; width=&quot;16&quot; align=&quot;absmiddle&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;/&gt; &quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I haven&apos;t tried this yet myself.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="391390" author="JIRAUSER71590" created="Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:55:14 +0200"  >&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;when MCpatcher, a 3rd party thing, was still supported&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It never was supported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;does Mojang ever intend to fix this&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s marked as postponed, meaning that it will be fixed later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;allow us to customize those hardcoded colors.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reddit.com/r/Minecraft/comments/66gcg9/mojang_really_need_to_make_it_easier_to_edit_the/dgiy1xb/?context=1&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;reddit&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt; Mojang really need to make it easier to edit the skybox and biome/foliage/light colors.&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://bugs.mojang.com/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=grum&quot; class=&quot;user-hover&quot; rel=&quot;grum&quot;&gt;grum&lt;/a&gt;: I have a branch with a prototype for this somewhere, might have time to work on it for 1.13 &lt;img class=&quot;emoticon&quot; src=&quot;https://bugs.mojang.com/images/icons/emoticons/smile.png&quot; height=&quot;16&quot; width=&quot;16&quot; align=&quot;absmiddle&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;/&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="391388" author="lapisdemon" created="Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:54:52 +0200"  >&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://bugs.mojang.com/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=r543&quot; class=&quot;user-hover&quot; rel=&quot;r543&quot;&gt;r543&lt;/a&gt; Do you refer to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reddit.com/r/Mojira/comments/4koetn/mc30445_swamp_mesa_biome_grass_ignores_both/d3hxgxm/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;this post here by Mr. Broes on Mojira&apos;s Reddit&lt;/a&gt; for &lt;a href=&quot;https://bugs.mojang.com/browse/MC-30445&quot; title=&quot;Swamp &amp;amp; Mesa Biome Grass Ignores both Colormaps&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;MC-30445&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;MC-30445&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Well from what I&apos;ve heard, they initially planned to have all old &quot;data values&quot; removed already in 1.12 and it seems they&apos;re aiming now for 1.13, &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reddit.com/r/Minecraft/comments/64x585/snapshot_17w15a_ready_for_testing/dg5rceu/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;as for the block ID update&lt;/a&gt; - what I mean by that example is: Good stuff needs a good amount of time &lt;img class=&quot;emoticon&quot; src=&quot;https://bugs.mojang.com/images/icons/emoticons/smile.png&quot; height=&quot;16&quot; width=&quot;16&quot; align=&quot;absmiddle&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;/&gt; It isn&apos;t easy to implement such a huge change into the current code, I&apos;ve read a few times that the &quot;code crumbled away&quot; under some Devs&apos; fingers when they tried to add something cool &lt;img class=&quot;emoticon&quot; src=&quot;https://bugs.mojang.com/images/icons/emoticons/sad.png&quot; height=&quot;16&quot; width=&quot;16&quot; align=&quot;absmiddle&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, I suppose they&apos;re still aiming for feature parity, which means that a change in Java-MC would possibly also have to be somehow implemented in the versions for other platforms, which would involve even more Devs who are maybe busy with (and have to prioritise) other stuff currently.. who knows.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But I recently read something about being able to change the Sky colours and foliage etc. in MAYBE 1.13 via Vanilla means (no MCPatcher/Optifine).. ah, &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reddit.com/r/Minecraft/comments/66gcg9/mojang_really_need_to_make_it_easier_to_edit_the/dgiy1xb/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;found it, it was Mr. Broes on Reddit&lt;/a&gt; &lt;img class=&quot;emoticon&quot; src=&quot;https://bugs.mojang.com/images/icons/emoticons/smile.png&quot; height=&quot;16&quot; width=&quot;16&quot; align=&quot;absmiddle&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
And &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reddit.com/r/Minecraft/comments/656rn1/dear_devs_thanks_for_the_colored_beds_however_i/dg9llp8/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;here another Reddit-reply of Mr. Bergensten&lt;/a&gt;, involving future respack plans &lt;img class=&quot;emoticon&quot; src=&quot;https://bugs.mojang.com/images/icons/emoticons/smile.png&quot; height=&quot;16&quot; width=&quot;16&quot; align=&quot;absmiddle&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;TLDR: It might often not seem that way, but some Devs actually care about some really neat future additions, but adding them isn&apos;t always possible due to various reasons, sometimes needing more time than initially planned.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I can only ask you (and others) for some more patience &lt;img class=&quot;emoticon&quot; src=&quot;https://bugs.mojang.com/images/icons/emoticons/smile.png&quot; height=&quot;16&quot; width=&quot;16&quot; align=&quot;absmiddle&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;/&gt;)&lt;br/&gt;
And sending some Love every now and then to the Devs might also help to encourage them in continue caring &lt;img class=&quot;emoticon&quot; src=&quot;https://bugs.mojang.com/images/icons/emoticons/wink.png&quot; height=&quot;16&quot; width=&quot;16&quot; align=&quot;absmiddle&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="391380" author="r543" created="Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:19:31 +0200"  >&lt;p&gt;Not to sound rude, but this is still a issue(in past when MCpatcher, a 3rd party thing, was still supported, you could use it to change the foilage AND water color, which worked nice), does Mojang ever intend to fix this?&lt;br/&gt;
Last post I&apos;ve found was from a year ago, stating that Mojang wants to give texture pack creators more freedom regarding colors, yet still nothing has happened, come on, allow us to customize those hardcoded colors.&lt;br/&gt;
Edit: more related to the Swamp &amp;amp; Mesa colors, but since those are all &quot;Resolved&quot; I decided to ask here, hope it isn&apos;t too rude.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="331293" author="marcono1234" created="Tue, 27 Sep 2016 18:36:03 +0200"  >&lt;p&gt;Confirmed for&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul class=&quot;alternate&quot; type=&quot;square&quot;&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;16w38a&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;


&lt;p&gt;Resource pack of &lt;a href=&quot;https://bugs.mojang.com/browse/MC-30445&quot; title=&quot;Swamp &amp;amp; Mesa Biome Grass Ignores both Colormaps&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;MC-30445&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;MC-30445&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; can be used&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="331222" author="galaxy_2alex" created="Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:06:41 +0200"  >&lt;p&gt;Is this still a concern in the &lt;em&gt;current Minecraft version&lt;/em&gt;? If so, please &lt;em&gt;update the affected versions&lt;/em&gt; in order to best aid Mojang ensuring bugs are still valid in the latest releases/pre-releases. If this has been done, we can reopen the issue.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Keep in mind that the &quot;Resolved&quot;-Status on this ticket just means &quot;Answered&quot;, and that we are waiting for further information on whether this issue still exists or not. It will be reopened as soon as the requested information has been delivered.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="318887" author="mathewalden" created="Fri, 1 Jul 2016 22:52:11 +0200"  >&lt;p&gt;Fabian: Yes. That is the new name of the file. And I wouldn&apos;t be surprised if watercolor.png has moved as well. But the glitch is still the same - these files exist and are supported by texture packs, but birch trees ignore the foliage file and the watercolor file is ignored entirely. &lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="318841" author="farogaming" created="Fri, 1 Jul 2016 19:11:06 +0200"  >&lt;p&gt;According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://minecraft.gamepedia.com/Resource_pack#Folder_structure&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://minecraft.gamepedia.com/Resource_pack#Folder_structure&lt;/a&gt; there is no &quot;foliagecolor.png&quot;. Was this changed to &quot;assets/minecraft/textures/colormap/foliage.png&quot;?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="274610" author="yarrmateys" created="Fri, 25 Dec 2015 19:47:49 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;it may be intended, but it may as well be something that was missed when the trees were upgraded from all hardcoded values to the new method.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;the new ones use the newer method as well as far as i know.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="274470" author="marcono1234" created="Thu, 24 Dec 2015 17:25:56 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;Confirmed for&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul class=&quot;alternate&quot; type=&quot;square&quot;&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;15w51b&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;


&lt;p&gt;Based on the code it seems to be intended:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;tt&gt;colorMultiplier(IBlockAccess worldIn, BlockPos pos, int renderPass)&lt;/tt&gt; method of the &lt;tt&gt;net.minecraft.block.BlockOldLeaf&lt;/tt&gt; class (MCP 1.8 names)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;code panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;codeContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;code-java&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;public&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class=&quot;code-object&quot;&gt;int&lt;/span&gt; colorMultiplier(IBlockAccess worldIn, BlockPos pos, &lt;span class=&quot;code-object&quot;&gt;int&lt;/span&gt; renderPass)
{
	IBlockState var4 = worldIn.getBlockState(pos);

	&lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;if&lt;/span&gt; (var4.getBlock() == &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt;)
	{
		BlockPlanks.EnumType var5 = (BlockPlanks.EnumType)var4.getValue(VARIANT_PROP);

		&lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;if&lt;/span&gt; (var5 == BlockPlanks.EnumType.SPRUCE)
		{
			&lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;return&lt;/span&gt; ColorizerFoliage.getFoliageColorPine();
		}

		&lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;if&lt;/span&gt; (var5 == BlockPlanks.EnumType.BIRCH)
		{
			&lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;return&lt;/span&gt; ColorizerFoliage.getFoliageColorBirch();
		}
	}

	&lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;return&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;super&lt;/span&gt;.colorMultiplier(worldIn, pos, renderPass);
}
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;tt&gt;colorMultiplier(IBlockAccess worldIn, BlockPos pos, int renderPass)&lt;/tt&gt; method of the &lt;tt&gt;net.minecraft.block.BlockLilyPad&lt;/tt&gt; class&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;code panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;codeContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;code-java&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;public&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class=&quot;code-object&quot;&gt;int&lt;/span&gt; colorMultiplier(IBlockAccess worldIn, BlockPos pos, &lt;span class=&quot;code-object&quot;&gt;int&lt;/span&gt; renderPass)
{
	&lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;return&lt;/span&gt; 2129968;
}
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="224054" author="marcono1234" created="Wed, 8 Apr 2015 15:22:16 +0200"  >&lt;p&gt;Confirmed for&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul class=&quot;alternate&quot; type=&quot;square&quot;&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;1.8.3&lt;/b&gt; however FallingSand blocks with &lt;tt&gt;Block:leaves&lt;/tt&gt; apparently use foliagecolor.png&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</comment>
                            <comment id="205184" author="jimmypl007" created="Sat, 25 Oct 2014 05:33:42 +0200"  >&lt;p&gt;Spruce and Birch ignore Foliage color Map 1.8.1-pre3&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="205183" author="jimmypl007" created="Sat, 25 Oct 2014 05:32:16 +0200"  >&lt;p&gt;it is still occurring will add updated picture. (as of 1.8.1-pre3)&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="205077" author="galaxy_2alex" created="Fri, 24 Oct 2014 23:28:23 +0200"  >&lt;p&gt;Is this still a concern in the &lt;em&gt;current Minecraft version&lt;/em&gt; &lt;b&gt;1.8.1 Prerelease 3&lt;/b&gt; / Launcher version &lt;b&gt;1.5.3&lt;/b&gt; or later? If so, please &lt;em&gt;update the affected versions&lt;/em&gt; in order to best aid Mojang ensuring bugs are still valid in the latest releases/pre-releases.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="159632" author="tangent65536" created="Sat, 24 May 2014 08:34:36 +0200"  >&lt;p&gt;Last seen on 14w20b.&lt;br/&gt;
Also have no effects all the foliage, vine and lily pad in the inventory while grass are affected by the given colormap.&lt;br/&gt;
lily pad &quot;block&quot; is not affected, but vine &quot;blocks&quot; are.&lt;br/&gt;
Hope the problem will be resolved.  &lt;img class=&quot;emoticon&quot; src=&quot;https://bugs.mojang.com/images/icons/emoticons/smile.png&quot; height=&quot;16&quot; width=&quot;16&quot; align=&quot;absmiddle&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="156838" author="jimmypl007" created="Sat, 10 May 2014 06:30:00 +0200"  >&lt;p&gt;latest snapshot as of May/10/2014&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="156826" author="jimmypl007" created="Sat, 10 May 2014 03:09:42 +0200"  >&lt;p&gt;yeah this issues still occurs&lt;br/&gt;
in the latest snapshot&apos;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://imgur.com/rMHEn1Y&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://imgur.com/rMHEn1Y&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;would be great to see it resolved&apos;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="155897" author="jar_" created="Tue, 6 May 2014 13:19:38 +0200"  >&lt;p&gt;Is this still a concern in the &lt;em&gt;current Minecraft version&lt;/em&gt; &lt;b&gt;14w19a&lt;/b&gt; / Launcher version &lt;b&gt;1.3.11&lt;/b&gt; or later? If so, please &lt;em&gt;update the affected versions&lt;/em&gt; in order to best aid Mojang ensuring bugs are still valid in the latest releases/pre-releases.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="144428" author="kumasasa" created="Mon, 3 Mar 2014 22:48:56 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;In fact the colour is hardcoded, reopened:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;code panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;codeHeader panelHeader&quot; style=&quot;border-bottom-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;BlockOldLeaf.java (as of MCP 9.03 / Minecraft 1.7.2)&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;codeContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;code-java&quot;&gt;    /**
     * Gets the foliage color &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;for&lt;/span&gt; birch type (metadata 2) trees
     */
    &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;public&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;static&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class=&quot;code-object&quot;&gt;int&lt;/span&gt; getFoliageColorBirch()
    {
        &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;return&lt;/span&gt; 8431445;
    }
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="144423" author="hartspoon" created="Mon, 3 Mar 2014 22:17:47 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;If birch and spruce leaves not being coloured by &lt;tt&gt;foliagecolor.png&lt;/tt&gt; isn&apos;t a bug, how come &lt;tt&gt;leaves_birch.png&lt;/tt&gt; and &lt;tt&gt;leaves_spruce.png&lt;/tt&gt; aren&apos;t coloured in the first place?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It doesn&apos;t really make sense to use a greyscale image, allowing the game to recolour it dynamically, if the said colour is then hardcoded in the game.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This should be marked as unresolved and confirmed.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="135047" author="branza" created="Sat, 25 Jan 2014 15:07:37 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;This is a bug, it doesn&apos;t make sense that birch and spruce leaves can&apos;t be changed by resource packs, but the other leaves can. Every texture and color should be changeable with resource packs.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="100913" author="jimmypl007" created="Thu, 5 Sep 2013 13:45:46 +0200"  >&lt;p&gt;i don&apos;t think the water is a problem anymore but the spruce and birch leaves &quot;BUG&quot; still occurs.. would be nice to see this &quot;BUG&quot; fixed..&lt;br/&gt;
due to the subject (the leaves) this should be considered a bug as all the others of the same type (leaves) including ones made in the same category(leaves) after those two, had the ability applied to it.. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;its not something that would arise without being shown and if this keeps getting side stepped as a Feature/Suggestion we will likely never see it Fixed.. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(we all know how much they love adding suggested features O.o)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;please get this seen by Mojang..&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="25683" author="mustek" created="Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:48:32 +0100"  >&lt;p&gt;This site is for bug reports only. For feature suggestions/changes please use the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.minecraftforum.net/forum/1-suggestions/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;MineCraft Forums: Suggestions&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10102">
                    <name>Duplicate</name>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is duplicated by">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="46868">MC-27087</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="51512">MC-30410</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="255487">MC-158936</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="260340">MC-161161</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="494573">MC-248322</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="504195">MC-252235</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                            <issuelinktype id="10103">
                    <name>Relates</name>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="relates to">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="51548">MC-30445</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                            <attachment id="14372" name="2012-11-28_14.04.16.png" size="517932" author="yarrmateys" created="Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:15:35 +0100"/>
                            <attachment id="63215" name="2014-05-10_09.00.46.png" size="509934" author="Jimmypl007" created="Sat, 10 May 2014 06:30:00 +0200"/>
                            <attachment id="64145" name="2014-05-24_14.28.54.png" size="222594" author="Tangent65536" created="Sat, 24 May 2014 08:36:20 +0200"/>
                            <attachment id="64146" name="2014-05-24_14.29.08.png" size="182842" author="Tangent65536" created="Sat, 24 May 2014 08:36:20 +0200"/>
                            <attachment id="64147" name="2014-05-24_14.29.13.png" size="247683" author="Tangent65536" created="Sat, 24 May 2014 08:36:20 +0200"/>
                            <attachment id="64148" name="2014-05-24_14.29.28.png" size="227101" author="Tangent65536" created="Sat, 24 May 2014 08:36:20 +0200"/>
                            <attachment id="84803" name="2014-10-25_11.26.11.png" size="534850" author="Jimmypl007" created="Sat, 25 Oct 2014 05:33:42 +0200"/>
                            <attachment id="189488" name="2018-11-13_09.26.51.png" size="1635505" author="LapisDemon" created="Tue, 13 Nov 2018 09:35:32 +0100"/>
                            <attachment id="189489" name="2018-11-13_09.29.12.png" size="1592731" author="LapisDemon" created="Tue, 13 Nov 2018 09:35:35 +0100"/>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10701" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:datetime">
                        <customfieldname>CHK</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>Sun, 31 May 2015 12:57:00 +0200</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10500" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:radiobuttons">
                        <customfieldname>Confirmation Status</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10302"><![CDATA[Community Consensus]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_11700" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10501" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:radiobuttons">
                        <customfieldname>Game Mode</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10305"><![CDATA[Creative]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_11600" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>0|i0kwof:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>