[MCPE-19828] Blocks after x/z +-4194304 are non-solid Created: 23/Jan/17 Updated: 26/Nov/24 Resolved: 24/Jan/17 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Minecraft (Bedrock codebase) |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | 1.0.2 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | ||
| Reporter: | Connor Steppie | ||
| Resolution: | Works As Intended | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Confirmation Status: | Unconfirmed | ||||||||
| Platform: | Tablet - iOS - iPad Air 2 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
YES I SEARCHED FOR THIS, I SEARCH ALL THE TIME BEFORE REPORTING BUGS, DONT GIVE ME ANY OF THAT So basically, if you travel more than 2^22 blocks from spawn in any direction, block physics start to screw up and blocks become sometimes solid and sometimes not. You can stand on the blocks normally sometimes, but moving will cause you to fall through the ground. After 8388608 it's pretty much a guaranteed fall. |
| Comments |
| Comment by BlobKat [ 11/Aug/21 ] |
|
Mojang seriously needs to let go of 32 bit eventually |
| Comment by Makzevu [ 04/Feb/21 ] |
|
This issue is still open. |
| Comment by Nightsky5568 [ 03/Feb/21 ] |
|
Can anyone provide a source to when they said they wont fix bugs that involve distance in bedrock? |
| Comment by Kristi Bektashi [ 26/Nov/20 ] |
|
Works as intended? Are you serious Mojang? |
| Comment by Aiken Paul [ 19/Oct/20 ] |
|
He says that anything past 8 million is just unplayable... 8 million is pretty far sure, but it's not unheard of for people to travel much farter than that in survival Java servers. You can get to 8 million overworld in under 12 hours if you fly with elytra through the nether, which really isn't extreme enough to justify this game-breaking bug imo My point is that with modern vanilla features, 8 million (and maybe even 22 million and 30 million) blocks isn't a massive, unobtainable distance that it used to be, so the game really shouldn't be breaking at that distance, especially considering the game encourages exploration |
| Comment by Matt S [ 24/Jan/17 ] |
|
This is a duplicate of |