| Type: | Bug | ||
| Reporter: | Chris | Assignee: | [Mojang] Jeb (Jens Bergensten) |
| Resolution: | Works As Intended | Votes: | 4 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Environment: |
MAC OSX |
||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CHK: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Confirmation Status: | Confirmed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Game Mode: | Creative | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
I de-powered 2 extended pistons at the same time. I did not expect the first piston to grab the second piston because they get de-powered at the same time. But instead, the first piston did grab the second piston. How to reproduce: |
| Comments |
| Comment by An_yMiner [ 18/Nov/15 ] |
|
I'm gonna miss this bug. |
| Comment by BoxFigs [ 12/Oct/14 ] |
|
Oddly enough, with the horizontal setup, if you place another block and put redstone on top, the pistons behave as they did before. |
| Comment by Brett Parshall [ 08/Mar/13 ] |
|
I honestly hope that this is fixed as Dico suggested, or it is returned to the way it used to be done. As it is now it actually makes the double/triple extenders harder to build. |
| Comment by Kwin van der Veen [ 08/Mar/13 ] |
|
If a bug would make an double piston extender more compact, doesn't mean it is consistent with the rest of the logic of the game. So I would really hope that this would either be removed or be made much more consistent. |
| Comment by Berni U [ 07/Mar/13 ] |
|
If you build the same setup but downwards, the upper piston doesn't retract the lower one, as it was in earlier versions. |
| Comment by DicoTheRedstoner [ 05/Mar/13 ] |
|
@Jeb can you then also make it retract the block? |
| Comment by Chris [ 01/Mar/13 ] |
|
If it would retract both the piston and the block above, it would indeed be easier but that's not the case. It only retracts the piston and it leaves the block, this makes it harder to make double extenders instead of easier. |
| Comment by [Mojang] Jeb (Jens Bergensten) [ 01/Mar/13 ] |
|
I've decided that this is the expected behavior. If I "fix" it, people will complain that it's much harder to do double-length piston extenders. |
| Comment by kbk [ 27/Feb/13 ] |
|
Reproducible in 13w09b. |
| Comment by kbk [ 13/Feb/13 ] |
|
Aha, and I thought that pistons are meant to extend in this manner too, but they don't due to |
| Comment by Chris [ 09/Feb/13 ] |
|
I'll explain: A piston cannot retract an extended piston. |
| Comment by Kumasasa [ 09/Feb/13 ] |
|
I don't see the bug here: Both pistons are de-powered = both pistons retract. When both pistons are observed independantly, the order of the two steps doesn't play a role here:
|
| Comment by kbk [ 08/Feb/13 ] |
|
Could not reproduce this in 13w06a, probably for the same reason. |
| Comment by Tails [ 07/Feb/13 ] |
|
Confirmed. |