| Type: | Bug | ||
| Reporter: | [Mod] Avoma | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 29 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| CHK: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Confirmation Status: | Confirmed | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Category: |
UI
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Mojang Priority: | Low | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Area: | Platform | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
| Comments |
| Comment by boda kugga [ 10/Aug/23 ] |
|
This became a concern for translations as boats now use the full item name due to the fix of |
| Comment by user-f2760 (Inactive) [ 10/Aug/23 ] |
|
This actually affects pretty much every gui, and translations can be problematic because of this. Suggested fix: make text scroll, just like UI buttons/sliders. |
| Comment by A user [ 06/Mar/22 ] |
|
Can confirm in 1.18.2. Plus it also happens on the horse inventory GUI, as shown in |
| Comment by [Mod] Avoma [ 01/Oct/21 ] |
|
I'd like to request ownership of this ticket since the current reporter has been inactive for over a year. I'm willing to keep this ticket updated and will continue to provide all of the necessary details. |
| Comment by [Mod] Avoma [ 04/Feb/21 ] |
|
Can confirm in 21w05b. |
| Comment by [Mod] Avoma [ 02/Dec/20 ] |
|
Can confirm in 20w49a. |
| Comment by [Mod] Avoma [ 25/Nov/20 ] |
|
Can confirm in 20w48a. |
| Comment by Oval [ 16/Jan/20 ] |
|
Done. I originally intended to use /give as changing the limit of the anvil would be mentioned quite quick on the tracker, so then I could update these. |
| Comment by Fabian Röling [ 16/Jan/20 ] |
|
Oval Can you please revert your last edit? The point of this report is that the anvil allows names that overflow the chest's name field. Commands allow arbitrarily long names anyway. The current reproduction steps are WAI. |
| Comment by Kraif [ 30/Aug/18 ] |
|
Confirmed for 1.13.1. |
| Comment by Fabian Röling [ 20/Aug/16 ] |
|
What exactly would be a correct behaviour?
|
| Comment by [Mod] Michael Wobst [ 19/Aug/16 ] |
|
Still an issue in 16w33a |
| Comment by Immaterialise [ 17/Feb/16 ] |
|
Confirmed for 1.9-pre1 |
| Comment by WolfieMario [ 02/May/13 ] |
|
I should mention that you don't hit the limit even with 30 characters if you use narrow ones such as i. Rather than reducing the maximum length of name, perhaps the same width calculation books perform could be used to determine what is or is not too long? This is similar to the bug with ~ on signs, and I doubt anybody would ask them to reduce the maximum amount of characters that can go on a sign. |
| Comment by Kumasasa [ 10/Jan/13 ] |
|
Confirmed. |