[MC-11866] Containers are dropping contents regardless of gamerule doTileDrops setting Created: 14/Mar/13 Updated: 08/May/17 Resolved: 10/Nov/15 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Minecraft: Java Edition |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Minecraft 1.5, Snapshot 13w11a, Minecraft 1.5.2, Minecraft 1.6.1, Minecraft 1.6.2, Minecraft 1.6.4, Minecraft 13w36b, Minecraft 13w37a, Minecraft 13w39a, Minecraft 13w39b, Minecraft 1.7.1, Minecraft 1.7.2, Minecraft 13w48a, Minecraft 13w48b, Minecraft 13w49a, Minecraft 1.7.3, Minecraft 1.7.4, Minecraft 14w05b, Minecraft 14w06b, Minecraft 14w07a, Minecraft 14w08a, Minecraft 1.7.5, Minecraft 1.8, Minecraft 1.8.1 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | ||
| Reporter: | Theo Winters | Assignee: | [Mojang] Searge (Michael Stoyke) |
| Resolution: | Works As Intended | Votes: | 5 |
| Labels: | container, doTileDrops, gamerule | ||
| Environment: |
Windows 7 x64, Java version 1.6 & 1.7, 4GB RAM |
||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CHK: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Confirmation Status: | Confirmed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
When destroying the following containers, the GameRule "doTileDrops" is overlooked when set to false: Chest Additionally, all items can be dropped by using the drop key or dragging them from the inventory with this GameRule set to false; perhaps an alternate GameRule "doItemDrops" could be applied here. |
| Comments |
| Comment by [Mojang] Searge (Michael Stoyke) [ 10/Nov/15 ] |
|
The content of inventories is not considered tile drops, so this gamerule doesn't apply |
| Comment by Adam brady [ 07/Jan/15 ] |
|
Can confirm for 1.8.1 |
| Comment by Itouch2 [ 01/Mar/14 ] |
|
Still a concern in 1.7.5 and 1.8 |
| Comment by Stephan Oster [ 12/Sep/13 ] |
|
13w37a still has this issue as well |
| Comment by [Mod] Torabi [ 12/Apr/13 ] |
|
I doubt that inventory contents technically count as "Tile Drops", even though you're breaking a tile (though anything with an inventory is actually a tile entity... which isn't really either, confusingly). So working as intended, most likely, though there perhaps should be a rule that covers these instances. |
| Comment by Anon Ymus [ 15/Mar/13 ] |
|
Confirmed in 13w11a. |