[MC-10906] Emeralds acting weirdly and messing item sorters! Created: 03/Mar/13 Updated: 07/Sep/15 Resolved: 28/Mar/13 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Minecraft: Java Edition |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Snapshot 13w09c |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | ||
| Reporter: | Ville Tarra | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Cannot Reproduce | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | item, redstone | ||
| Environment: |
windows 7, java 64bit(newest) acer 5560g i don't know how this helps but it doesn't matter |
||
| Attachments: |
|
| Confirmation Status: | Unconfirmed |
| Game Mode: | Creative |
| Description |
|
I was messing with item sorters,hoppers and came along weird bug that emeralds act different then glowstone,diamond,iron or lapis maybe even more (these were the only ones that i tested). It seems like hoppers wont detect emerald unless it is placed directly on top of it, other wise it will just skip it and go to misc chest. There is a way to fix this but it would require way more resources and would be bigger. This is design from ac-tennis, just simplified, and bugged. - vilhardo |
| Comments |
| Comment by Ville Tarra [ 14/Apr/13 ] |
|
This was patched in the latest update so its impossible to reproduce |
| Comment by Yichen Cao [ 29/Mar/13 ] |
|
Yup, unable to reproduce |
| Comment by Tails [ 28/Mar/13 ] |
|
Unable to reproduce. |
| Comment by Yichen Cao [ 27/Mar/13 ] |
|
Its not a bug, and your "sorter" is not an item sorter. There are no priority for items to be sucked out from the bottom, instead it will be random depending on the location you put the hoppers. Ergo, if you put a hopper in the center pointing to left, and another hopper under it, the hopper will pick whether to send it to the left or below based on the location. An actual sorter will require droppers at the top. View MinecraftPG5 for a vid on an actual sorter. Also, no offense. |
| Comment by Markku [ 03/Mar/13 ] |
|
Daniel, ask that from Atlassian. Basically, there is a single list of "versions" that can be selected items from in any place where one or more versions are asked. |
| Comment by Daniel [ 03/Mar/13 ] |
|
People have access to mark their bugs as unreleased version. Then why there is an option to do that? |
| Comment by Ville Tarra [ 03/Mar/13 ] |
|
Well if this wont get fixed it will be in 1.5 and if there is option to add future version, why shouldn't i put it there? take it away then if its that big of a deal >.< |
| Comment by Tails [ 03/Mar/13 ] |
|
Please do not mark unreleased versions as affected. You do not have access to this yet. |