---- Minecraft Crash Report ---- // Daisy, daisy... Time: 14.07.18 23:38 Description: Exception generating new chunk java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: java.lang.RuntimeException: We are asking a region for a chunk out of bound | 1874997 1874999 at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.reportGet(CompletableFuture.java:357) at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.get(CompletableFuture.java:1887) at tb.c(SourceFile:126) at tj.a(SourceFile:85) at tk.c(SourceFile:123) at tc.i_(SourceFile:220) at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.w(SourceFile:690) at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.v(SourceFile:623) at dft.v(SourceFile:157) at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.run(SourceFile:526) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: We are asking a region for a chunk out of bound | 1874997 1874999 at th.c(SourceFile:117) at axq.y(SourceFile:45) at th.a_(SourceFile:123) at ajj.a(SourceFile:107) at axz.a(SourceFile:286) at boj.b(SourceFile:116) at tv.a(SourceFile:15) at tp.a(SourceFile:35) at bmr.a(SourceFile:95) at tw.a(SourceFile:62) at tw.a(SourceFile:25) at acr$a.a(SourceFile:130) at acr$a$$Lambda$1719/598803438.apply(Unknown Source) at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.uniApply(CompletableFuture.java:602) at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$UniApply.tryFire(CompletableFuture.java:577) at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$Completion.exec(CompletableFuture.java:443) at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:289) at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.runTask(ForkJoinPool.java:1056) at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1689) at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:157) A detailed walkthrough of the error, its code path and all known details is as follows: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Head -- Thread: Server thread Stacktrace: at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.reportGet(CompletableFuture.java:357) -- Chunk to be generated -- Details: Location: 1874997,1874998 Position hash: 8053055091940405 Generator: boj@6c87596f Stacktrace: at tb.a(SourceFile:170) at tb.c(SourceFile:129) at tj.a(SourceFile:85) at tk.c(SourceFile:123) at tc.i_(SourceFile:220) at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.w(SourceFile:690) at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.v(SourceFile:623) at dft.v(SourceFile:157) at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.run(SourceFile:526) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) -- Affected level -- Details: Level name: New World All players: 1 total; [te['Cool'/73, l='New World', x=29999999.00, y=120.00, z=29999999.00]] Chunk stats: ServerChunkCache: 281 Drop: 0 Level seed: 2534646123024735436 Level generator: ID 00 - default, ver 1. Features enabled: true Level generator options: {} Level spawn location: World: (-68,64,196), Chunk: (at 12,4,4 in -5,12; contains blocks -80,0,192 to -65,255,207), Region: (-1,0; contains chunks -32,0 to -1,31, blocks -512,0,0 to -1,255,511) Level time: 331877 game time, 331877 day time Level dimension: 0 Level storage version: 0x04ABD - Anvil Level weather: Rain time: 93781 (now: false), thunder time: 86378 (now: false) Level game mode: Game mode: survival (ID 0). Hardcore: false. Cheats: false -- System Details -- Details: Minecraft Version: 1.13-pre8 Operating System: Windows 10 (amd64) version 10.0 Java Version: 1.8.0_51, Oracle Corporation Java VM Version: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (mixed mode), Oracle Corporation Memory: 372051352 bytes (354 MB) / 1040187392 bytes (992 MB) up to 1073741824 bytes (1024 MB) JVM Flags: 9 total; -XX:HeapDumpPath=MojangTricksIntelDriversForPerformance_javaw.exe_minecraft.exe.heapdump -Xss1M -Xmx1G -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:+UseG1GC -XX:G1NewSizePercent=20 -XX:G1ReservePercent=20 -XX:MaxGCPauseMillis=50 -XX:G1HeapRegionSize=16M Profiler Position: N/A (disabled) Player Count: 1 / 8; [te['Cool'/73, l='New World', x=29999999.00, y=120.00, z=29999999.00]] Data Packs: vanilla Type: Integrated Server (map_client.txt) Is Modded: Probably not. Jar signature remains and both client + server brands are untouched.