---- Minecraft Crash Report ---- // This doesn't make any sense! Time: 2/2/21 1:47 PM Description: Exception generating new chunk java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: The value 0 is not in the specified inclusive range of 1 to 32 at org.apache.commons.lang3.Validate.inclusiveBetween(Validate.java:1032) at afi.(SourceFile:96) at afi.(SourceFile:92) at clx.(SourceFile:98) at cjq.c(SourceFile:313) at java.util.Map.computeIfAbsent(Map.java:957) at cjq.a(SourceFile:313) at cls.a(SourceFile:66) at cjb.f(SourceFile:71) at cjb$d.doWork(SourceFile:263) at cjb.a(SourceFile:219) at aai.a(SourceFile:562) at com.mojang.datafixers.util.Either$Left.map(Either.java:38) at aai.a(SourceFile:556) at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.uniCompose(CompletableFuture.java:952) at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$UniCompose.tryFire(CompletableFuture.java:926) at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$Completion.run(CompletableFuture.java:442) at aak.b(SourceFile:58) at aoz.e(SourceFile:94) at aoz.a(SourceFile:137) at aoz.run(SourceFile:105) at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask$RunnableExecuteAction.exec(ForkJoinTask.java:1402) at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:289) at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.runTask(ForkJoinPool.java:1056) at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1692) at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:157) A detailed walkthrough of the error, its code path and all known details is as follows: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Head -- Thread: Server thread Stacktrace: at org.apache.commons.lang3.Validate.inclusiveBetween(Validate.java:1032) at afi.(SourceFile:96) at afi.(SourceFile:92) at clx.(SourceFile:98) at cjq.c(SourceFile:313) at java.util.Map.computeIfAbsent(Map.java:957) at cjq.a(SourceFile:313) at cls.a(SourceFile:66) at cjb.f(SourceFile:71) at cjb$d.doWork(SourceFile:263) at cjb.a(SourceFile:219) -- Chunk to be generated -- Details: Location: 6,-9 Position hash: -38654705658 Generator: cls@39b713de Stacktrace: at aai.a(SourceFile:562) at com.mojang.datafixers.util.Either$Left.map(Either.java:38) at aai.a(SourceFile:556) at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.uniCompose(CompletableFuture.java:952) at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$UniCompose.tryFire(CompletableFuture.java:926) at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$Completion.run(CompletableFuture.java:442) at aak.b(SourceFile:58) at aoz.e(SourceFile:94) at aoz.a(SourceFile:137) -- Affected level -- Details: All players: 0 total; [] Chunk stats: 529 Level dimension: minecraft:overworld Level spawn location: World: (104,3,-136), Section: (at 8,3,8 in 6,0,-9; chunk contains blocks 96,0,-144 to 111,-1,-129), Region: (0,-1; contains chunks 0,-32 to 31,-1, blocks 0,0,-512 to 511,-1,-1) Level time: 0 game time, 0 day time Level name: New World Level game mode: Game mode: survival (ID 0). Hardcore: false. Cheats: false Level weather: Rain time: 0 (now: false), thunder time: 0 (now: false) Known server brands: vanilla Level was modded: false Level storage version: 0x04ABD - Anvil Stacktrace: at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.a(SourceFile:385) at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.l_(SourceFile:334) at eue.d(SourceFile:69) at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.w(SourceFile:644) at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.a(SourceFile:257) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) -- System Details -- Details: Minecraft Version: 21w03a Minecraft Version ID: 21w03a Operating System: Mac OS X (x86_64) version 10.16 Java Version: 1.8.0_74, Oracle Corporation Java VM Version: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (mixed mode), Oracle Corporation Memory: 785002184 bytes (748 MB) / 1711276032 bytes (1632 MB) up to 2147483648 bytes (2048 MB) CPUs: 8 JVM Flags: 8 total; -Xss1M -Xmx2G -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:+UseG1GC -XX:G1NewSizePercent=20 -XX:G1ReservePercent=20 -XX:MaxGCPauseMillis=50 -XX:G1HeapRegionSize=32M Player Count: 0 / 8; [] Data Packs: vanilla Type: Integrated Server (map_client.txt) Is Modded: Probably not. Jar signature remains and both client + server brands are untouched.