---- Minecraft Crash Report ---- // Uh... Did I do that? Time: 4/7/22, 1:47 PM Description: Accessing LegacyRandomSource from multiple threads java.lang.IllegalStateException: Accessing LegacyRandomSource from multiple threads at akr.a(SourceFile:84) at cxi.c(SourceFile:49) at cww.a(SourceFile:33) at akd.b(SourceFile:936) at awz.a(SourceFile:39) at blv.a(SourceFile:62) at blu.a(SourceFile:238) at ced.a(SourceFile:531) at cxk.a(SourceFile:464) at cue.b(SourceFile:174) at cue$d.doWork(SourceFile:341) at cue.a(SourceFile:292) at adw.a(SourceFile:664) at com.mojang.datafixers.util.Either$Left.map(Either.java:38) at adw.a(SourceFile:658) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$UniCompose.tryFire(CompletableFuture.java:1150) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$Completion.run(CompletableFuture.java:482) at ady.b(SourceFile:62) at awh.h(SourceFile:91) at awh.a(SourceFile:146) at awh.run(SourceFile:102) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask$RunnableExecuteAction.exec(ForkJoinTask.java:1395) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:373) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.topLevelExec(ForkJoinPool.java:1182) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.scan(ForkJoinPool.java:1655) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1622) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:165) A detailed walkthrough of the error, its code path and all known details is as follows: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Head -- Thread: Server thread Stacktrace: at akr.a(SourceFile:84) at cxi.c(SourceFile:49) at cww.a(SourceFile:33) at akd.b(SourceFile:936) at awz.a(SourceFile:39) at blv.a(SourceFile:62) at blu.a(SourceFile:238) at ced.a(SourceFile:531) at cxk.a(SourceFile:464) at cue.b(SourceFile:174) at cue$d.doWork(SourceFile:341) at cue.a(SourceFile:292) -- Thread dumps -- Details: Thread dumps: Worker-Main-20: at java.base/java.lang.Thread.getStackTrace(Thread.java:1610) at akr.a(SourceFile:92) at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:197) at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$2$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:179) at java.base/java.util.Spliterators$ArraySpliterator.forEachRemaining(Spliterators.java:992) at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:509) at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:499) at java.base/java.util.stream.ReduceOps$ReduceOp.evaluateSequential(ReduceOps.java:921) at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234) at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.collect(ReferencePipeline.java:682) at akr.a(SourceFile:82) at cxi.c(SourceFile:49) at cww.a(SourceFile:33) at akd.b(SourceFile:936) at awz.a(SourceFile:39) at blv.a(SourceFile:62) at blu.a(SourceFile:238) at ced.a(SourceFile:531) at cxk.a(SourceFile:464) at cue.b(SourceFile:174) at cue$d.doWork(SourceFile:341) at cue.a(SourceFile:292) at adw.a(SourceFile:664) at com.mojang.datafixers.util.Either$Left.map(Either.java:38) at adw.a(SourceFile:658) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$UniCompose.tryFire(CompletableFuture.java:1150) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$Completion.run(CompletableFuture.java:482) at ady.b(SourceFile:62) at awh.h(SourceFile:91) at awh.a(SourceFile:146) at awh.run(SourceFile:102) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask$RunnableExecuteAction.exec(ForkJoinTask.java:1395) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:373) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.topLevelExec(ForkJoinPool.java:1182) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.scan(ForkJoinPool.java:1655) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1622) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:165) Stacktrace: at akr.a(SourceFile:84) at cxi.c(SourceFile:49) at cww.a(SourceFile:33) at akd.b(SourceFile:936) at awz.a(SourceFile:39) at blv.a(SourceFile:62) at blu.a(SourceFile:238) at ced.a(SourceFile:531) at cxk.a(SourceFile:464) at cue.b(SourceFile:174) at cue$d.doWork(SourceFile:341) at cue.a(SourceFile:292) at adw.a(SourceFile:664) at com.mojang.datafixers.util.Either$Left.map(Either.java:38) at adw.a(SourceFile:658) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$UniCompose.tryFire(CompletableFuture.java:1150) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$Completion.run(CompletableFuture.java:482) at ady.b(SourceFile:62) at awh.h(SourceFile:91) at awh.a(SourceFile:146) at awh.run(SourceFile:102) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask$RunnableExecuteAction.exec(ForkJoinTask.java:1395) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:373) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.topLevelExec(ForkJoinPool.java:1182) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.scan(ForkJoinPool.java:1655) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1622) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:165) -- Chunk to be generated -- Details: Location: -37,-61 Position hash: -257698037797 Generator: cxk@b88ba1e Stacktrace: at adw.a(SourceFile:664) at com.mojang.datafixers.util.Either$Left.map(Either.java:38) at adw.a(SourceFile:658) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$UniCompose.tryFire(CompletableFuture.java:1150) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$Completion.run(CompletableFuture.java:482) at ady.b(SourceFile:62) at awh.h(SourceFile:91) at awh.a(SourceFile:146) at awh.run(SourceFile:102) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask$RunnableExecuteAction.exec(ForkJoinTask.java:1395) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:373) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.topLevelExec(ForkJoinPool.java:1182) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.scan(ForkJoinPool.java:1655) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1622) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:165) -- System Details -- Details: Minecraft Version: 22w14a Minecraft Version ID: 22w14a Operating System: Windows 10 (amd64) version 10.0 Java Version: 17.0.1, Microsoft Java VM Version: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (mixed mode), Microsoft Memory: 587941376 bytes (560 MiB) / 2147483648 bytes (2048 MiB) up to 2147483648 bytes (2048 MiB) CPUs: 12 Processor Vendor: GenuineIntel Processor Name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10750H CPU @ 2.60GHz Identifier: Intel64 Family 6 Model 165 Stepping 2 Microarchitecture: unknown Frequency (GHz): 2.59 Number of physical packages: 1 Number of physical CPUs: 6 Number of logical CPUs: 12 Graphics card #0 name: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Graphics card #0 vendor: NVIDIA (0x10de) Graphics card #0 VRAM (MB): 4095.00 Graphics card #0 deviceId: 0x2191 Graphics card #0 versionInfo: DriverVersion=30.0.15.1215 Graphics card #1 name: Intel(R) UHD Graphics Graphics card #1 vendor: Intel Corporation (0x8086) Graphics card #1 VRAM (MB): 1024.00 Graphics card #1 deviceId: 0x9bc4 Graphics card #1 versionInfo: DriverVersion=26.20.100.7985 Memory slot #0 capacity (MB): 8192.00 Memory slot #0 clockSpeed (GHz): 3.20 Memory slot #0 type: DDR4 Memory slot #1 capacity (MB): 8192.00 Memory slot #1 clockSpeed (GHz): 3.20 Memory slot #1 type: DDR4 Virtual memory max (MB): 18598.52 Virtual memory used (MB): 12871.37 Swap memory total (MB): 2432.00 Swap memory used (MB): 47.25 JVM Flags: 9 total; -XX:HeapDumpPath=MojangTricksIntelDriversForPerformance_javaw.exe_minecraft.exe.heapdump -Xss1M -Xmx2G -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:+UseG1GC -XX:G1NewSizePercent=20 -XX:G1ReservePercent=20 -XX:MaxGCPauseMillis=50 -XX:G1HeapRegionSize=32M Server Running: true Player Count: 1 / 8; [aek['Osciris72'/119, l='ServerLevel[New World]', x=-903.10, y=-40.75, z=-1211.72]] Data Packs: vanilla World Generation: Stable Type: Integrated Server (map_client.txt) Is Modded: Probably not. Client jar signature and brand is untouched; Server jar signature and brand is untouched