---- Minecraft Crash Report ----
// This doesn't make any sense!

Time: 27/04/2022 16:15
Description: Exception generating new chunk

java.io.EOFException
	at java.base/java.io.DataInputStream.readUnsignedShort(DataInputStream.java:346)
	at pq.a(SourceFile:54)
	at pq$1.a(SourceFile:34)
	at oz$1.a(SourceFile:136)
	at pu$b.a(SourceFile:50)
	at pf$1.a(SourceFile:91)
	at oz$1.a(SourceFile:96)
	at pj.a(SourceFile:120)
	at cvx.a(SourceFile:65)
	at cvu.b(SourceFile:218)
	at cvu.a(SourceFile:231)
	at aww$b.run(SourceFile:59)
	at awu.h(SourceFile:91)
	at awu.a(SourceFile:146)
	at awu.run(SourceFile:102)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)


A detailed walkthrough of the error, its code path and all known details is as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- Head --
Thread: Server thread
Stacktrace:
	at java.base/java.io.DataInputStream.readUnsignedShort(DataInputStream.java:346)
	at pq.a(SourceFile:54)
	at pq$1.a(SourceFile:34)

-- Chunk to be generated --
Details:
	Location: 3,13
	Position hash: 55834574851
	Generator: cyd@b2dd600
Stacktrace:
	at aeg.a(SourceFile:684)
	at com.mojang.datafixers.util.Either$Left.map(Either.java:38)
	at aeg.a(SourceFile:672)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$UniCompose.tryFire(CompletableFuture.java:1150)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$Completion.run(CompletableFuture.java:482)
	at aei.b(SourceFile:62)
	at awu.h(SourceFile:91)
	at awu.a(SourceFile:146)
	at awu.run(SourceFile:102)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask$RunnableExecuteAction.exec(ForkJoinTask.java:1395)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:373)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.topLevelExec(ForkJoinPool.java:1182)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.scan(ForkJoinPool.java:1655)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1622)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:165)

-- System Details --
Details:
	Minecraft Version: 22w17a
	Minecraft Version ID: 22w17a
	Operating System: Windows 10 (amd64) version 10.0
	Java Version: 17.0.1, Microsoft
	Java VM Version: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (mixed mode), Microsoft
	Memory: 1292506160 bytes (1232 MiB) / 2147483648 bytes (2048 MiB) up to 2147483648 bytes (2048 MiB)
	CPUs: 8
	Processor Vendor: GenuineIntel
	Processor Name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8265U CPU @ 1.60GHz
	Identifier: Intel64 Family 6 Model 142 Stepping 12
	Microarchitecture: whiskey Lake
	Frequency (GHz): 1,80
	Number of physical packages: 1
	Number of physical CPUs: 4
	Number of logical CPUs: 8
	Graphics card #0 name: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
	Graphics card #0 vendor: NVIDIA (0x10de)
	Graphics card #0 VRAM (MB): 2048,00
	Graphics card #0 deviceId: 0x174e
	Graphics card #0 versionInfo: DriverVersion=30.0.14.7196
	Graphics card #1 name: Intel(R) UHD Graphics 610
	Graphics card #1 vendor: Intel Corporation (0x8086)
	Graphics card #1 VRAM (MB): 1024,00
	Graphics card #1 deviceId: 0x3ea1
	Graphics card #1 versionInfo: DriverVersion=27.20.100.8729
	Memory slot #0 capacity (MB): 4096,00
	Memory slot #0 clockSpeed (GHz): 2,40
	Memory slot #0 type: DDR4
	Memory slot #1 capacity (MB): 4096,00
	Memory slot #1 clockSpeed (GHz): 2,40
	Memory slot #1 type: DDR4
	Virtual memory max (MB): 29576,24
	Virtual memory used (MB): 11040,79
	Swap memory total (MB): 21504,00
	Swap memory used (MB): 569,82
	JVM Flags: 9 total; -XX:HeapDumpPath=MojangTricksIntelDriversForPerformance_javaw.exe_minecraft.exe.heapdump -Xss1M -Xmx2G -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:+UseG1GC -XX:G1NewSizePercent=20 -XX:G1ReservePercent=20 -XX:MaxGCPauseMillis=50 -XX:G1HeapRegionSize=32M
	Server Running: true
	Player Count: 0 / 8; []
	Data Packs: vanilla
	World Generation: Stable
	Type: Integrated Server (map_client.txt)
	Is Modded: Probably not. Client jar signature and brand is untouched; Server jar signature and brand is untouched